Most people were members of small groups of friends, family, and business associates with whom they had interaction on almost a daily basis. However, no mention was made of how non-Muslims are treated.
Kantian philosophy and humanism have been used as potential foundations for leadership. Although personalism does not exist as a formal field of philosophy and is not clearly defined, its five themes are very similar to the broad aspects of a biblical worldview.
When that decision is made purely upon relativistic frameworks, not only varying but frightening decisions can arise. Many find their roots in Old Testament instructions from God to the nation of Israel regarding the structure of the Hebrew society. Teams of players coordinated their actions better with a servant leader resulting in improved outcomes for the followers but not for the selfless leaders.
People have value that exists apart from any sense of utility. In addition, humanism itself seems to be on the decline as it appears to be forsaking its original commitment to human interests as the center of civilization. Joe Iarocci, author of Servant Leadership in the Workplace, identifies 3 key priorities developing people, building a trusting team, achieving results3 key principles serve first, persuasion, empowerment and 3 key practices listening, delegating, connecting followers to mission that distinguish servant leadership in the workplace context.
The idea of one agent using another, even if it is voluntary, is unacceptable. The emphasis on the individual is a key aspect of personal dignity. The use of power must affirm and strengthen human dignity. The shareholder perspective promotes profit alone as the major consideration in business decisions while the stakeholder perspective promotes human and social impact as the major considerations in business decisions.
Can philosophy provide a foundation for servant leadership? History[ edit ] Servant leadership is an ancient philosophy. However, the components of a Judeo-Christian worldview were not explained in any detail by any of these authors.
I believe the absence of a philosophic foundation for servant leadership, which conceptually anchors ethics or morality in a specific philosophic system, causes one to be unable to answer clearly the question: Both Judaism and Christianity still suffer from practical issues related to gender discrimination, yet they tend to have a better track record in their treatment of women than the three religions previously examined.
When a person has a strong sense of dignity or self-respect; he or she strives to live in a manner that affirms that dignity, giving honor to the image of God within him or her. The most glaring effect is that values or morality are cast as a purely individual or relative matter.
Leadership experts such as Bolman, Deal, Covey, Fullan, Sergiovanni, and Heifitz also reference these characteristics as essential components of effective leadership. Stewardship includes the development of personal skills and abilities, stewardship of community, management of personal and social resources, management of social systems, care for the marginalized, and care for the environment, among other things.
Is that not what it means to know me? How compatible will some theories be with some cultures?
This is justice coupled with love. Merriam argued that population growth has cheapened our concept of the value of humans to the point that there is greater outcry over the torture of an animal as opposed to a human. Like Hinduism, it too has a strong emphasis on karma and how previous lives create the current reality in which individuals find themselves.
Values flow from a philosophic position or worldview.
Individual leadership theories may embody worldviews in differing degrees of application.The Islamic religion share some but dose not share the essential characteristics of servant leadership. The Islamic religion treats Muslims and non-Muslims very different.
Non-Muslims are referred to as dhimmi, which are considered second class citizens. Journal of Religion and Business Ethics Volume 3 Article 13 Is Servant Leadership Inherently Christian?
Andrey V. Shirin John Lelnd Center for Theological Studies, [email protected] Servant leadership is a philosophy and set of practices that enriches the lives of individuals, builds better organizations and ultimately creates a.
Religion in and of itself is about servant leadership, and that approach transcends all beliefs regardless of the one that we choose for ourselves. I realize that we have all kinds of people attending the World Campus and that mixed within those various cultural, ethnic, and religious backgrounds.
Having argued that there is a necessity to link worldviews to religion, the paper then examines extant leadership literature linking religion to leadership studies and specifically whether or not the five major world religions (Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism) have any serious incompatibility with servant leadership.
Servant leadership is a leadership philosophy. Traditional leadership generally involves the exercise of power by one at the “top of the pyramid.” By comparison, the servant-leader shares power, puts the needs of others first and helps people develop and perform as highly as possible.
Servant leadership turns the power pyramid upside down.Download