And since it imposes on the freedom of others, it is not an instance of freedom. You are free to walk down the street, but not to keep others from doing so. By the way, the cartoon below, which is Lakoff hate speech widely circulated on social media right now, is arguably pretty much a misrepresentation of Popper.
In Australia we once had a referendum on whether to ban the Communist Party, which at the time was arguing that wealthy capitalists were destroying the country.
That is because language has a psychological effect imposed physically — on the neural system, with long-term crippling effects. It imposes on their ability to think and act. As I mentioned, I can see the argument for a line. Technically any language that affects us does this.
It is actually physical in nature because all ideas are physically constituted by neural circuitry in our brains. This is a gap between the law and the truth.
Hate speech attributes to that class of people certain highly negative qualities taken to be inherent in members of the class. This is a gap between the law and the truth.
Hate speech has a physiological impact. Perhaps the most dangerous form of hate speech comes from the government itself when the President excuses racist violence and supports the oppressive use of governmental force — large, organized crowds of armed demonstrators, police who target minorities, ICE trapping undocumented immigrants for deportation, discriminatory laws that intimidate minorities from voting, etc.
Therefore, freedom rules out imposing on the freedom of others. Freedom in a free society is freedom for all. The imposition on the freedom of others can come in overt, immediate physical form — thugs coming to attack with weapons.
Language can thus change brains, both for the better and the worse. And since it imposes on the freedom of others, it is not an instance of freedom.
After that, some thoughts on why he might be wrong. When hate is physically in your brain, then you think hate and feel hate, you are moved to act to carry out what you physically, in your neural system, think and feel.There seem to be more and more claims that “hate speech” should not be entitled to the normal privileges of free speech.
To my surprise, one of them is George Lakoff – famed cognitive scientist, philosopher and metaphor expert. Here’s the admirably clear Lakoff writing a blog post titled. Nov 13, · Un exercitiu interesant: gasiti cine foloseste political correctness si cine hate speech in politica romaneasca.
"Political Correctness" and Hate Speech (Lakoff), posted with vodpod "Political Correctness" and Hate Speech (Lakoff) - Presentation Transcript “ POLITICAL CORRECTNESS” AND HATE SPEECH The Word as Sword Robin Tolmach Lakoff.
And Why Hate Speech is Not Free Speech by George Lakoff Originally published by George Lakoff on killarney10mile.com | Twitter: @georgelakoff | Republished with permission | View the original article | Photo: Ben Taylor| George Lakoff is contributing author to United We Stand (Garn Press), available on Amazon ($).
When hate is physically in your brain, then you think hate and feel hate, you are moved to act to carry out what you physically, in your neural system, think and feel.
That is why hate speech in not “mere” speech. speech”, the author dwells on the current definitions of hate speech as any form of expression regarded as offensive to racial, ethnic, and religious groups and other discreet minorities, and to women.
The imposition on the freedom of others can come in overt, immediate physical form — thugs coming to attack with weapons. Violence may be a kind of expression, but it certainly is not “free speech.” Like violence, hate speech can also be a physical imposition on the freedom of others.Download