An analysis of the objective observation of human nature in the prince by machiavelli

Politics may set the terms within which other interests are pursued — but there are other interests and other pursuits. Prince, xxii, 86 If, then, Machiavelli is neither clearly a psychological egoist nor an adherent to some extreme version of pessimism about human goodness or rather its absencewhat sort of conception of human nature is reflected in The Prince?

He makes the generalization that men are, " People will naturally feel a sense of obligation after receiving a favor or service, and this bond is usually not easily broken.

According to Machiavelli, a prince who finds himself under siege must draw on his prowess to unite the people in fear and hatred of the aggressor. Throughout the book, Machiavelli blurs the boundaries between the human and the animal.

He is a careful and intelligent observer of the world around him, but there is nothing to suggest that any of his staements on human nature are meant to be self-sufficient and unqualified by what he has to say elsewhere.

Equally easily, one can find textual support — often in the same texts — for claims that seem to echo the Christian doctrine of Original Sin.

Machiavelli applies this question specifically to the failure of past Italian princes. Machiavelli has become to be regarded as "the founder of modern day, secular politics. The foregoing, I think, is a fair though sketchy presentation of the conception of human nature that finds expression in The Prince.

In short, a prudent prince, with sufficient fortifications and provisions, may easily overcome a siege. Active Themes Citing the modern examples of independent German cities, Machiavelli writes, "A prince who has a well-fortified city and does not make himself hated is secure against attack.

The bond of love is one which men, wretched creatures they are, break when it is to their advantage to do so; but fear is strengthened Machiavelli states, "It is obviously not easy to assault a town which has been made into a bastion by a prince who is not hated by the people.

It is not necessary for him to be loved; in fact, it is often better for him to be feared. Much of The Prince is devoted to describing exactly what it means to conduct a good war: Nevertheless, loyalties are won and lost, and goodwill is never absolute. The Prince does something similar — with humanism, Christianity, political practice, traditional virtues, even mirror-for-princes books.

Therefore, if a prince wants to maintain his rule he must learn not to be so virtuous, and to make use of this or not according to need. Princes who possess both physical defenses and popular support protect themselves with highly effective and complementary means and thus make unappealing targets for foreign aggressors.

Italy is waiting to see who can be the one to heal her wounds, put and end to the sacking of Lombardy, to extortion in the Kingdom and in Tuscany, and cleanse those sores which have been festering so long. An economist need not believe that all people are rational profit maximizers, only that in certain contexts it is useful so to model them.

Machiavelli draws a distinction between princes who possess territory and resources such that they can "stand alone" and those who "must always have recourse to the protection of others. It is easy to find textual support for claims that appear to presuppose or be equivalent to some version of psychological egoism.

Retrieved September 22, Men worry less about doing an injury to one who makes himself loved than to one who makes himself feared.

Indeed, only when he is absolutely sure that the people who hate him will never be able to rise against him can a prince cease to worry about incurring the hatred of any of his subjects.

He attempts to compromise between free will and determinism by arguing that fortune controls half of human actions and leaves the other half to free will. People are generally self-interested, although their affection for others can be won and lost.Part of Machiavelli’s aim in writing The Prince is to investigate how much of a prince’s success or failure is caused by his own free will and how much is determined by nature or the environment in which he lives.

Machiavelli applies this question specifically to the failure of past Italian princes. This passage from Chapter VI is an example of Machiavelli's use of assumptions about human nature to justify political action.

A prince must have no other objective [ ] but that of war, its methods and its discipline, for that is the only art expected of a ruler. Prototype Prince. Machiavelli met him on diplomatic mission, MACHIAVELLI'S VIEW OF HUMAN NATURE, Free Study Guides and book notes including comprehensive chapter analysis, complete summary analysis, author biography information, character profiles, theme analysis, metaphor analysis, and top ten quotes on classic literature.

In The Prince Niccolo Machiavelli presents a view of governing a.

Machiavelli's The Prince, part 7: the two sides of human nature

A Critical Analysis Of Machiavellis The Prince Philosophy Essay. Print Reference this. Machiavelli’s prophetic prince has philosopher’s features as he tries to reform human opinion over the justice and evil; he acts as if he is good, but does not have to be good. To describe the genuine prince, Machiavelli comes up with a metaphor.

Machiavelli - Human Nature. Machiavelli - Human Nature In The Prince Niccolo Machiavelli presents a view of governing a state that is drastically different from that of humanists of his time.

Human Nature According to Niccolo Machiavelli, Karl Marx, and Ayn Rand.


Jonathan Rick Issue XXVI How one views human nature informs the entirety of one’s philosophy. Machiavelli intends The Prince as a pragmatic manual; and so makes himself the father of realpolitik. Realpolitik is a politics of adaptation to the existing state of.

An analysis of the objective observation of human nature in the prince by machiavelli
Rated 4/5 based on 66 review